Yes, some of us may be strong enough to resist, revolt against, and maybe even overthrow an unjust system and replace it with something fairer. Others may not be and that does not necessarily make them complicit.
That’s not to say that some shortsighted fools will not side with the oppressor against their own long term best interests. But the one thing we must not do is blame the victims. Nothing infuriates me as strongly. It is salt rubbed into the wound of inequality and injustice.
@aral If you admit that:
Others may not be [strong] and that does not necessarily make them complicit.
then why do you treat all the people that organize and go to conferences backed by GAFAM like they were traitors? It seems a bit incoherent from my perspective.
I would completely understand boycotting events, but you go much further with that and it’s not aligned with what you’ve just wrote about people not strong enough not being complicit.
I'd even be careful about blaming the wolves too hard, because that's where the analogy stops: You're not necessarily born a wolf but the system is set up so you need to decide to either be taken advantage of or take advantage of others (or even both at the same time), it's hard to blame someone for not wanting to be a victim and rationalizing they're less wolf-ish than the other wolves.
There needs to be a way to be successful without making others lose.
The social network of the future: No ads, no corporate surveillance, ethical design, and decentralization! Own your data with Mastodon!