Recent searches
Search options
We should not be optimising Mastodon so it can handle more people per server. We should be optimising Mastodon so it incentivises more serves with fewer people.
(And if you take that line of thinking to its logical conclusion, you arrive at the idea behind the Small Web: https://ar.al/2020/08/07/what-is-the-small-web/)
Food for thought: The bigger mastodon.social gets, the less successful the #fediverse is.
Sadly, the fundamental design of Mastodon mirrors the design of Big Tech (a server architecture that can support hundreds of thousands of “users”) and thus inherits its success criteria.
I feel it’s time we at least started thinking about what the web would look like if we all had our own place on it and what it would take to get there from here.
@aral It's not ideal and doesn't fulfil the small web goals I'd like to see achieved but I am trying to set up a personal mastodon server at least. It's a start. Even if we eventually ditch mastodon, at least it's part of... I think you've described it as "decentralising yourself"
@GeneticJen Hey, every step is a step and that sounds like a very positive one :)
I think what I was saying was about “decentring yourself” (as in making things that don’t rely on you being at the centre to be successful) but decentralising yourself sounds good too :)
PS. Hugo (@mastohost hosts mine and he’s great, in case you don’t want yet another server to admin).