Hands up if you think public EU money being awarded by @NGIZero / @fsfe should be subject to a transparent process where we can see all internal discussions/comments/reasoning concerning funding decisions including who made them.
I detailed our last funding application myself here but it only tells half the story:
https://ar.al/2022/07/29/nlnet-grant-application-for-domain/
https://ar.al/2022/09/28/nlnet-grant-application-for-domain-first-update-questions-and-answers/
https://ar.al/2022/10/20/nlnet-grant-application-for-domain-rejected/
@NGIZero @fsfe So here’s what I want to see:
1. Who exactly is involved in approving/rejecting each application, including their qualifications, and a transparent – and ideally democratic – process for electing judging panels at intervals.
2. A public transcript of all conversation/deliberation for each application, archived for posterity.
3. All correspondence between the applicant and the judging panel.