mastodon.ar.al is one of the many independent Mastodon servers you can use to participate in the fediverse.
This is my personal fediverse server.

Administered by:

Server stats:

1
active users

Except for being a political move, to ban an EU politician, isn't this a clear violation of Schengen agreement?
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schengen

And in practical terms without actual borders how do they prevent someone from just driving from France, Netherlands into Germany?

How can they know he is not IN GERMANY as they issued this ban?

What are they going to do, open up a concentration camp for non-genocide supporters.

The maturity of German politicians is of anthropological interest.

@aral

en.wikipedia.orgSchengen Agreement - Wikipedia

@yianiris I was wondering about that too.

@aral @yianiris Wondering if it is safe to comment on this, being on a German instance.

@martinvermeer @aral @yianiris
Why not?
If they want to go back to their old goose-stepping ways, then we can move to an instance with humanitarian values.

I've seen the speech he was going to give. Calling out a state for supporting a genocide shouldn't get one banned from that nation, nor from a social media instance.

@Jeramee @aral @yianiris Been thinking about that. Haven't been censored yet, but I feel the chill. As a scientist, I shouldn't have to leave an instance called fediscience. BTW the problem is not the instance but the jurisdiction.

@aral
I wasn’t thinking about Schengen so much as the EU. Is there some loophole here that makes freedom of movement for EU citizens not apply? Or is Germany just being blatantly illegal here?
@yianiris

@tkinias @aral @yianiris IIRC the UK barred Geert Wilders from entering multiple times while it was an EU member

You are comparing a moderate social-democrat with a neo-nazi on purpose or is it pure naivety.

People who advocate and promote hate against any humans should be banned from the planet. Although I think social-democracy in this age is a lie, I don''t equate it with hate ideologies.

@alex @tkinias @aral

@yianiris @tkinias @aral Whoa, sorry if it came across like that. I was just pointing out that EU member states can bar EU citizens from entering from a legal perspective – I completely agree that doing so in this case is not right

@tkinias @aral @yianiris freedom of movement doesn’t grant unconditional right to cross borders for citizens. GER banned that Austrian Neonazi from entering the country recently. Also countries are allowed to expel EU citizens if they don’t have a job for example, which leads to them having to apply for residence. doesn’t always happen in practice as long as I know

I get the German argumentation for this ban, but not meaning I agree with it.

I am having a very difficult time remaining civil in discussions equating a Neo-Nazi with a social democrat ex-minister, parliament member, party-leader.

One that has made a cross European name speaking of EU's prime problem being a deficit of democracy.

All #Germany has done today is prove his point. How many #EU countries would dare hold a referendum right now about condemning/Supporting #Israel's murdering campaign?

NONE

@lontrachen @tkinias @aral

@yianiris @tkinias @aral I didn’t compare them. I used the case as an example that is recently being discussed in the media.

I couldn't give a damn about his politics or economic theories, but this must be an unprecedented move for Germany, despite of this huge amount of legislation they have for antisemitism.

Which indicates a very clear EU/NATO position to pursue this #war against #Iran which the entire climate indicates for the past 6 months.

Under the premise that the US/UK/EU is already at war, we should expect further #humanrights deterioration by the capitalist war machine

@aral fl0_id@mastodon.social

@yianiris @aral you can certainly get to a lot of very weird conclusions if you start from a premise that is clearly non-factual...

@yianiris @aral you use the word premise precisely once in the post I responded to.

@Amoshias @yianiris @aral

Then explain how he is wrong? How are they not at war already?

@Jeramee @yianiris @aral I legitimately don't know how to answer that. How are you not a rooster?

I mean... Because words have meaning? Is that the answer? Because that's not what those words mean?

@Amoshias

You are asking 3 people neither one realizes to what context are you responding to, and what you write is a bit incoherent. You are speaking but not saying much.
Can you be a bit more specific?

@Jeramee @aral

@Amoshias
Words have meaning, but I have no idea what you mean by calling me a rooster here, other than it being a pathetically incompetent way of casting an insult. That's an ad hominem attack, btw, which is a logical fallacy.

So, stop being rude and answer the question: how are they wrong?
@yianiris @aral

The US has been interfering and capturing Iranian interest vessels in international waters and passages for years, in some cases stealing their cargo. The US/UK have been striking #Yemen for its involvement in actively providing support for the concentration camps of Gaza and W-Bank under fire.

That is not war, what is then?

@Amoshias @aral

@yianiris @aral I think you are an incredibly lucky person and have lived an incredibly privileged life that you can ask that question.

For your sake I hope you are able to go to your grave still being able to look at the situation you described and ask "if that's not war what is."

@aral @yianiris Last year I travelled to Germany twice, and there were border checkpoints on the Austria-Germany border. While the car I was in was just waved through, they were stopping and checking some other cars…

@jernej__s @aral

This is an exception because they consider Austria's border patrol for immigrants insufficient, but towards BE/NE/LUX FR there are no perceived borders. Some border crossing buildings have been converted to truck-stop/travel-plaza stations.

At night coming from Netherlands you can tell the border as the highway is no longer lit like it is day.

@yianiris @aral pretty sure it’s not, general absence of controls etc does not mean you cannot prohibit ppl. Like recently it happened to a right guy from Austria. It does seem really weird in this instance, but it’s not generally impossible.

@yianiris @aral

“What are they going to do, open up a concentration camp for non-genocide supporters.”

🔥

@yianiris @aral the 2004 EU citizenship directive allows member states to restrict Schengen rights for people for several reasons, including 'public policy'. There are a bunch of vague caveats to that, but nothing concrete in my reading that makes this action unlawful, unfortunately :/ (or at least, nothing Germany couldn't argue for years in court about at any rate). Someone better at reading legalese than me might be able to weigh in with a better answer though.

Laws are chaotic, politics should make sense to the masses, despite legalities.

Banning an ex-minister of another EU member state, to enter in an effort to silence him is beyond any legality a provocation and revocation what the EU has promoted.

It is an indication how Germany thinks and acts at this point.
This is the same country that hosted a #WTO meeting and treated the town it was held as if it was under military emergency to prevent "intruders".

@iMeddles @aral

@yianiris @aral Of course countries can legally do this. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Persona_

Just because you live in a shared flat, does not mean that you must allow everyone to enter your room.

en.wikipedia.orgPersona non grata - Wikipedia

Totalitarian regimes silence ideas, democratic institutions are not afraid of ideas, if they are in fact democratic.

This is not about entering Germany, he probably couldn't care less himself, it is about ideas being suppressed in Germany so Germans don't get to hear anything but the dominant mass media position.

@mikalkulas @aral

@aral Henker Deutschland ist zurück. Die Denkenden sind im Exil oder unter sich. Der Staat bekommt Angst wenn wir das sehen und weitet mitunter bestimmt Überwachung aus.

@aral No, Germany is not okay. The public debate about Palestine is firmly in the hand of zionists. Any kind of support of Palestinian people is considered antisemitism. It is insane.

@aral Ban on online participation? What would be the legal basis for that?

@aral what puzzles me slightly is that Varoufakis posts still on Twitter. Hasn't he gotten the news this is a Nazi show now?

@aral @maxheadroom

Ouch, ouch ouch. I've been following Yanis and DiEM for some years now and I really hope this stuff can be resolved in a positive way. We need organizations like this so badly, and they need to do things right.

@violetmadder I'd be severely doubtful that it'd ever be resolved because that... isn't the point, particularly among the branches (which definitely engage in cults of personality while justifying a lot of status quo under the guise of "progressive" politics). Mostly, it's because they seek to maintain state-structures but under their leadership with their specific goals.

They're also not keen on receiving criticism at most levels about anything, which uh... If you do, you largely get a response like what @aral got in the PDF update to that post. Even today.

@aral @maxheadroom Oof. Have you found a “replacement” for DiEM25?

I like Volt’s platform but find their tactics too timid to get behind.

@hans @maxheadroom I’ve basically come to the conclusion that no hierarchical structure, regardless of where it sits on the spectrum is fit for purpose if that purpose is to devolve power and make progress towards a fair, equal, and just society. So I’d look for flat structures that are not trying to replace the current power hierarchy with their own but to dismantle that hierarchy.

@aral @maxheadroom I want hierarchy dismantling but am quite concerned that by avoiding authority, we (progressives) are opting out of social leadership.

@hans @aral @maxheadroom allow me to suggest that focusing too much on (anti-)hierarchy reproduces it. Since reading Christoph Spehr's "eine Grundlegung der freien Kooperation" around 2000 I rather focus on how free cooperation can take many different forms including (temporary) hierarchical ones but requires the freedom to exit without sanctions .... No English translation I know off but here is an English interview with Christoph networkcultures.org/geert/out- from 2006 and still on point today

networkcultures.orgGeert | Out-Cooperating the Empire? – Exchange with Christoph Spehr

@hpk the interview is great, I'm only halfway through and have marked it up with highlights. Wish I read German.

@hans great to hear you also appreciate it. It's indeed a long interview and discussion and contains a lot of interesting points (even though the praise of wikipedia is a bit too high in hindsight, but ok) even 18 years it was conducted. I still know of no other german intellectual promoting a similarly deep understanding of free co-operation, and the distinction of online and physical interactions. It's a pity that his german essays and writing have not been translated much as far as i see.

@aral

This is how the world descends into apocalyptic barbarism from the combined effects of overpopulation and global climate change. The worldwide resurgence of authoritarianism, tribalism, and fascism is not coincidental.

@aral
Varoufakis is an attention addicted, trouble making prat. Germany is doing the right thing.

@aral@mastodon.ar.al They obviously long for the good old days of fascism.

@aral oh wait it's that guy who worked at Valve

@aral FFS. People on social can be intensely opinionated - I get that - but this coupling of ignorance and strong opinion is something I was hoping we left at Xitter.

Germany is a powder keg. Berlin in particular.
Free speech is being sacrificed with some regularity to retain peace, much to the benefit of the population.

When people bring Zionism into a debate about a fascist regime warring with a guerilla org, they dumb down what could have been a useful discussion.

@quitty > Free speech is being sacrificed with some regularity to retain peace, much to the benefit of the population.

Ssh, mustn’t upset the plebs, eh? Their little minds couldn’t possibly take being exposed to dangerous ideas like maybe we shouldn’t be complicit in genocide (you know, after that whole Holocaust oopsie). Daddy knows best.

@aral
I'm not sure, but doesn't the European Country of Human rights have something to say about this?

@aral @bmi @DIMR_Berlin @Bundesregierung @bundestag @fragdenstaat

Könnt ihr das bestätigen, die Rechtsgrundlage (besonders für den Teil mit den Online-Meetings) und die Begründung nennen?

(Quick try to get confirmation, reasoning and legal basis from our government.)

@aral @andreasdotorg
Is Varoufakis in generally banned, or just from attending the canceled pro-palestinean congress?

The congress was (as expected) closed by police as it - even though it had been warned not - gave Salman Abu Sitta a platform. He has been banned by courts from any political activity in Germany as he has been inciting / calling for hate crime and violence in the past.

Thus the (quite probably temporary and event-specific) "ban" of Yanis simply was to prevent complicity.

@aral thanks, hon, we're mostly OK 😘 (aside from general fear of far right-wing parties taking over in a few states, that is)

So, to put that article into perspective: Varoufakis is DiEM25's most well-known member, so it's a bit surprising to assume they are impartial reporters here.
I can't find a another source for the claim that Varoufakis was denied entry or similar; in contrast, he's on record (twitter) to claim that German authorities had prohibited him from engaging in politics in …
1/2