@danjac@masto.ai Does it matter? If a person who actively supports genocide is “good”, we need a new word that actually means “good”.
@aral
1984 to the rescue! I submit “double-plus-un-bad” for your consideration.
In all seriousness, anyone supporting genocide can’t be called “good”. He may be “marginally less horrible” but not “good”.
Also, if a policy position that doesn’t include genocide is too much to ask… I don’t know what to tell you.